Janice Tjen vs Maja Chwalinska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Aug at 07:34 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Tjen vs M. Chwalinska

INA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tjen 1 - 0 Chwalinska
They have played 2 sets in total, with Janice Tjen winning 2 and Maja Chwalinska winning 0. The last match between Janice Tjen and Maja Chwalinska was at the U.S. Open - New York, 21-08-2025, Round: Q2, Surface: Hard, with Janice Tjen getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tjen | 1 |
| Chwalinska | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q2) U.S. Open - New York(08-21-25)
J. Tjen vs M. Chwalinska H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $235,544 | Career Prize Money | $446,659 |
| 83.44% (126-25) | Career Total W/L | 65.77% (244-127) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 15 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 76.92% (10-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 25.00% (1-3) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
J. Tjen vs M. Chwalinska Match Preview:
- Chwalinska has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 40.33% of points compared to Tjen's 37.67%. Could this be a decisive factor?
- In terms of returning second serves, Chwalinska again holds an advantage, having won 48.6% of opponent's points versus Tjen's 46.01%.
- For first serve returns, Chwalinska is notably stronger, with 35.74% success compared to Tjen's 30.1%.
- Under pressure, Chwalinska saves 52.36% of breakpoints while Tjen manages 49.03%. Could this resilience give Chwalinska the upper hand?
- Overall match-winning rates show Tjen leading with 86.36% over Chwalinska's 55.81% in the past year, suggesting Tjen has been more successful.
- Chwalinska excels on clay with a 69% success rate, while Tjen is unbeatable on indoor hard courts, winning 100% of her matches there.
- In terms of player level experience, Tjen outperforms with 82.35% wins at higher-level tournaments compared to Chwalinska's 56.52%.
- Chwalinska faces stronger opponents ranked at an average of 223.58, indicating potentially tougher matches than Tjen, whose opponents average at 358.93.
- Both players have identical performance in deciding sets, each winning 58% of them, posing a competitive edge for either in tight situations.
- Chwalinska is more effective in break point opportunities, converting 43.62% against Tjen's 39% in recent matches.
Editorial Prediction (August 21, 2025, UTC):
Considering recent performance metrics, Chwalinska shows a notable advantage in handling both second serve points and break point opportunities. These strengths could prove critical in securing a win in tightly contested games.
Despite this, Tjen's exceptional overall match-winning record over the past year cannot be overlooked, suggesting a consistent level of high performance. Furthermore, her success in high-level tournaments adds to her credentials.
While Chwalinska displays commendable resilience under pressure and against stronger opponents, Tjen’s superior win record and adaptability on different surfaces might tip the scales slightly in her favor.
In conclusion, while Chwalinska presents solid competition, Tjen's recent form and tournament success make her the likely victor in this upcoming tennis match.
Janice Tjen vs Maja Chwalinska Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Tjen vs M. Chwalinska H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:45:0 | Average Match Time | 1:45:0 |
| 68% (54/79) | 1st Serve % | 67% (47/70) |
| 72% (39/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (30/47) |
| 52% (13/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 61% (14/23) |
| 60% (3/5) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 37% (26/70) | Return Points Win % | 34% (27/79) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Tjen Recent Matches Played
M. Chwalinska Recent Matches Played

J. Tjen vs M. Chwalinska Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 83.44% (126/25) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.77% (244/127) |
| 79.51% (260/67) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.20% (529/308) |
| 63.53% (1817/1043) | Games Win/Loss | 55.90% (4171/3291) |
| 81.82% (108/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.49% (40/23) |
| 92.86% (13/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.63% (149/65) |
| 100.00% (5/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.26% (48/33) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 0.27 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 382 | Aces Total | 187 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 316 | Total Double Faults | 753 |
| 1:24:2 | Average Match Time | 1:41:3 |
| 343.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 455.55 |
| 65% (5280/8174) | 1st Serve % | 71% (16300/23098) |
| 69% (3619/5280) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (9567/16300) |
| 52% (1503/2894) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3332/6798) |
| 50% (657/1315) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1625/3273) |
| 50% (4425/8867) | Return Points Win % | 49% (11470/23581) |
| 80.00% (4/1) | Slam W/L | 45.83% (11/13) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 81.82% (9/2) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (7/7) |
| 79.55% (70/18) | Challenger W/L | 68.27% (213/99) |
| 95.35% (41/2) | Futures W/L | 70.59% (12/5) |
| 84% (125/149) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (239/361) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 64% (18/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (37/71) |
| 69% (18/26) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (55/97) |
| 94% (123/116) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (239/211) |
| 5% (123/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (239/28) |
| 36% (28/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (132/32) |